Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2026

How Women’s Invisible Labor Shaped Astronomy

By Kimberly Mitchell

For centuries, the work women did in astronomy went uncredited. Much of that work has been lost to the past, but some examples exist of women astronomers whose work was never fully recognized in their time or was attributed to men. 

  • Sophia Brahe (1556–1643) assisted her brother, Tycho Brahe, with detailed astronomical observations and record‑keeping that Tycho used in his publication, “De Nova Stella.” Her contributions were treated as assistant work, although the observations she helped produce were foundational for heliocentric orbital theory.

  • Maria Margarethe Winckelmann Kirch (1670–1720) collaborated closely with her husband, Gottfried Kirch, at the Berlin Academy, making observations and calculations and co‑discovering at least one comet in 1702. The comet discovery was formally credited to her husband, and after his death, Maria was denied his post because of her gender.

  • Caroline Herschel (1750–1848) catalogued nebulae and clusters, discovered multiple comets, and compiled an influential index of nebulae that underpinned her brother, William Herschel’s, work. Much of her cataloging and reduction work appeared under William’s name, with Caroline described as an assistant, despite being the first salaried woman astronomer and an accomplished observer in her own right.


Sophia Brahe in 1602.
Photo: Wikimedia Commons
We will never fully know the extent to which women contributed to astronomy in its earliest recorded days, but these women, whose efforts went mostly unrecognized or whose contributions were downplayed, were part of the early invisible labor that shaped astronomy.


Moving from the early modern era to the late modern era, women’s contributions to astronomy continued, with work still largely invisible or unacknowledged. In the 19th and 20th centuries, women filled the roles of human “computers.” The calculations they made pushed astronomy forward even as their contributions remained largely unknown. 

  • Annie Maunder (1868–1947) was one of the first “lady computers” at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. Maunder worked alongside her husband, Edward, studying the prolonged period of time from 1645 to 1715 when little sunspot activity appeared on the Sun. Edward Maunder eventually published two papers on the phenomenon, but Annie’s name was excluded because she lacked a college degree. This work is now known as the Maunder Minimum, with Annie finally getting the credit she deserves.

  • Mary Adela Blagg (1858–1944) was a self‑taught mathematician who did meticulous work standardizing lunar nomenclature and analyzing lunar features. Her observations were crucial to lunar mapping. She also worked on variable stars. 

  • Women worked as “computers” at many major observatories (Harvard, Yerkes, Mount Wilson, etc.) They measured positions, spectra, and brightnesses from photographic plates to produce catalogs of stellar classification, variable‑star studies, and galactic structure. Their contributions are buried in annual reports and plate logs, remaining largely unknown.

  • Jocelyn Bell Burnell (b. 1943) identified the first radio pulsar in the data from a new radio telescope she helped build while still a graduate student. The 1974 Nobel Prize for this discovery went to her (male) supervisor and a senior colleague, with Bell Burnell’s contribution omitted completely. As Bell Burnell was graduate student, the omission was controversial, but her contribution to the discovery was well-documented.

  • Margaret Burbidge (1919–2020) co‑authored the landmark B²FH paper explaining how elements are formed in stars and was a leader in observational spectroscopy. While she is now well-known, she faced early exclusion from the use of some telescopes. 


Harvard Computers in March 1898. 
Photo credit: UAV 630.271 (E4116), olvwork432388. Harvard University Archives.
While women in astronomy today are now credited for their work, the invisible labor continues in various ways, ultimately affecting individual careers and the advancement of women in the field in the long run. 

Invisible labor continues to impact the lives and work of women astronomers. While it looks different today than simply excluding women from recognition for their work, it is still a significant problem that must be recognized and rectified to bring true parity to the field. 





Thursday, November 20, 2025

Crosspost: Dorothy Tang - Meet the Archives Fellow Enriching the Historical Record of Women in the Physical Sciences

Dorothy Tang is an Archives Fellow at AIP, focusing on improving the documentation of women in the physical sciences through conducting new oral histories for the Niels Bohr Archives and highlighting interesting narratives within existing collections. The AIP publishes its findings bimonthly on Ex Libris Universum.
Today we're sharing Dorothy Tang's recent post about her work, and her intentions to blog about interesting stories from the archives throughout the next year. To follow her posts, sign up for the newsletter at Ex Libris Universum.

Meet the Archives Fellow Enriching the Historical Record of Women in the Physical Sciences

In July 2025, AIP started an initiative to improve the documentation and contributions of women in the physical sciences. With the help of the Henry Luce Foundation, the project is underway and I’m very excited to be working with the Niels Bohr Library & Archives (NBLA) team as the newly minted Archives Fellow.
As the fellow, I’m tasked with improving the historical record of women in the physical sciences across a variety of areas. I am conducting archival research and identifying stories that forefront women scientists’ experiences in their professional, academic, and personal lives. This will take the form of blog posts and social media posts, highlighting themes and through lines across NBLA’s oral history and archival collections. I am also enhancing the oral history collection by conducting new oral history interviews with scientists at various stages in their careers. Lastly, I am supporting NBLA’s ongoing outreach endeavors, such as participating in Wikipedia edit-a-thons to improve and promote historical information about women in the physical sciences and their discoveries in the field.

A bit about me

I recently completed my Master of Library and Information Science program at the University of Maryland, with a focus in Archives and Digital Curation. An enduring dimension of my work has been audio storytelling, as I come from a community archives background and specialize in oral histories. Prior to entering archives, I worked in independent broadcast journalism.
As an archivist, some of my interests include people-centered narratives, information and power, digital cultural memory, scent and memory, and reparative archival work. I’m deeply fascinated with the past, meaning making, and how structures of power and knowledge shape our realities and how we relate to each other and ourselves.

What I’m excited about

With the guidance of AIP historians Anna Doel and Jon Phillips, I’m learning more about interviewing scientists and history of science approaches to storytelling. I’ve interviewed a variety of people such as activists, humanities professors, authors and more, yet somehow I’ve never done an oral history with a physicist, so I’m eager for the opportunity to do so!
I’ve also started doing some research by going through AIP’s existing collection of over 1500 oral history transcripts and looking for threads across interviews or over an individual scientist’s life. I’m especially interested in personal narratives and themes such as mentorship and peer networks, motherhood and family building, philosophy and science, and other motifs that give insight to women scientists’ interior lives, in addition to their intellectual contributions.
I’m also particularly interested in archival research and understanding the past through the lens of scent. We live in an ocularcentric and text-heavy world, and I’m really curious about the kind of information we can glean from engaging with our other senses such as smell and touch. What can we learn by smelling with intention? How can an olfactive lens enrich our understanding of human experiences within the archival record? I’d like to bring this sensorial approach to information gathering into my research and oral history interviewing—I can’t wait to see where it goes.

Current musings

One of the first oral history interviews I delved into was that of renowned astrophysicist Sandra Faber. She is one of the few women scientists that AIP was able to interview repeatedly over the years. Over her career, AIP interviewed her three times—in 1988, 2002 and 2020. I am especially interested in seeing if upon reflection, there were any major changes in how she understood her experiences in grad school and various institutions, as each interview was conducted across various stages in her career.
Read the rest of Dororthy Tang's post at AIP.org and follow along her with her journey into the research archives. 
Faber Works at Telescope Controls.
 

Credit: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, courtesy AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives, Physics Today Collection



Thursday, September 4, 2025

Margaret Rossiter's Life and Work Brought Women Scientists to Light

Margaret Rossiter wouldn't listen. 

She once asked a group of mostly male professors and students in the history of science department at  Yale if there were ever any women scientists, as they had never been discussed this at these regular monthly gatherings.

"No," they answered. "None." Someone hedged that Marie Curie might be an exception. And that was that.

Rossiter didn't listen to these responses. She didn't believe that women scientists hadn't played a role in the history of American science. She spent the next fifty years of her career disproving that sentiment and chronicling the contributions of women in science.

Margaret W. Rossiter in 1989.
 
Office of Visual Services (UREL), Cornell University
.


Rossiter was born in Malden, Massachusetts. She became interested in the history of science in high school. She attended Radcliffe and graduated with a degree in the history of science, then earned master's degrees from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the same field, and in philosophy at Yale, where that famous conversation about women scientists took place. She stayed at Yale to complete her PhD, where she worked on agricultural science.

While agricultural science was the focus of her first published work, Rossiter still gravitated to the idea that women scientists did exist and played an important part in the development of science. She began researching this idea and delved into writing her first book on the history of women in science, Women Scientists in America, Struggles and Strategies to 1940, published in 1984. Rossiter followed that book with two more: Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940–1972, published in 1995, and Women Scientists in America Volume 3: Forging a New World Since 1972, published in 2012.

Rossiter wrote the first book while juggling a series of visiting professorships and grants, as she struggled to find a tenured position. At one point, she said she identified with those women scientists who also struggled. Rossiter finally found tenureship at Cornell where, after two years as a visiting professor, Cornell gave her an endowed chair in their new Department of Science and Technology. 

Rossiter was the recipient of many grants and awards throughout her career, including the Guggenheim Fellowship, the MacArthur Fellows Program, the Women's Prize from the History of Science Society, and the George Sarton Medal. The Women's History Prize was eventually renamed in her honor. 

In addition, Rossiter coined the phrase "the Matilda effect" to refer to the tendency within science to attribute women scientists' discoveries to their male counterparts. In doing so, she drew attention to this bias in science.

In 2019, Smithsonian Magazine featured Rossiter and the immediate impact of her work on women in STEM, saying, "In excavating the lives of forgotten women astronomers, physicists, chemists, entomologists and botanists, Rossiter helped clear the way for women scientists in the future." Read more from that article at Smithsonian Magazine.

Margaret Rossiter died August 3, 2025, after a long career in supporting women in science and preserving their stories and rightful places in history. 

Read more about Rossiter's life at the Cornell Chronicle or the New York Times. 

Friday, July 19, 2024

AASWomen Newsletter for July 19, 2024

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of July 19, 2024
eds: Jeremy Bailin, Nicolle Zellner, Sethanne Howard, and Hannah Jang-Condell

[We hope you all are taking care of yourselves and each other. --eds.]

This week's issues:
Dorothy Vaughan, a "hidden figure"
Dorothy Vaughan, a "hidden figure"
Credit: NASA

1. Celebrating Apollo-era Women    
2. AAS seeking plenary speakers for AAS 245
3. Heising-Simons Foundation’s Science Program Soliciting Proposals 
4. Black Space Week 2024 Recordings Available 
5. This Month in Astronomical History: July 2024   
6. Sloan Research Fellowships 
7. Mary-Lou Pardue, MIT professor whose anti-bias efforts lifted women in science, dies at 90
8. How to Submit to the AASWomen Newsletter
9. How to Subscribe or Unsubscribe to the AASWomen Newsletter
10. Access to Past Issues of the AASWomen Newsletter

An online version of this newsletter will be available at http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/ at 3:00 PM ET every Friday.

Thursday, July 4, 2024

4th of July Stars of All Stripes

Henrietta Swan Leavitt (1921)
Henrietta Swan Leavitt (1921)
Image Credit: William Henry



On the 158th anniversary of her birth, we celebrate Henrietta Swan Leavitt and other stars. 

Swan Leavitt was one of the many Harvard computers who catalogued hundreds of thousands of stars and made important contributions to advances in Astronomy. Her particular contribution was measurements of the relative brightness of Cepheid variable stars, which helped scientists to determine distances to stars. After her death from cancer in 1921, her work was used by Edwin Hubble to determine that the Milky Way is not the only galaxy in the observable universe. Exercises utilizing the Leavitt Law are common in Astronomy classes around the world.

It seems appropriate that Henrietta was born on the 4th of July. Afterall, Cepheids get brighter and fainter in the sky just like fireworks.


Happy Birthday, Henrietta!



two women astronauts
(L) Shannon Lucid on Mir.
(R) Susan Helms in the Spacelab module.

In 1996, two women astronauts unknowingly donned the same celebratory socks, as they flew in space on different stations on the 4th of July. Shannon Lucid was aboard the Russian space station Mir, and Susan Helms was in the Spacelab module during the STS-78 mission. 



The sky never fails to deliver a fantastic show, even if clouds get in the way. Check out some of the July 4th posts at Astronomy Picture of the Day.



Be safe out there.











Friday, May 10, 2024

AASWomen Newsletter for May 10, 2024

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of May 10, 2024
eds: Jeremy Bailin, Nicolle Zellner, Sethanne Howard, and Hannah Jang-Condell

[We hope you all are taking care of yourselves and each other. --eds.]

This week's issues:
Gruber Prize Recipient Marcia Rieke.
Image Credit: NASA

1. Advocating to Change Academia for Mothers 
2. Marcia Rieke Receives $500,000 Gruber Cosmology Prize
3. AIP Launches the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Belonging, & Accessibility Strategic Plan
4. 2024 Advancing IDEA in Planetary Science Conference: Save the Date  
5. 4 Amazing Women From History You’ve Probably Never Heard Of
6. Graphic novels can help boost diversity in STEM 
7. How to Submit to the AASWomen Newsletter
8. How to Subscribe or Unsubscribe to the AASWomen Newsletter
9. Access to Past Issues of the AASWomen Newsletter

An online version of this newsletter will be available at http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/ at 3:00 PM ET every Friday.

Thursday, October 5, 2023

Women Eclipse Chasers

We welcome contributions from our readers! This week’s guest post was written by Thomas Hockey, Distinguished Research Professor at the University of Northern Iowa. He lives on the path of the 1869 total eclipse of the Sun. His post is especially timely as we in the United States prepare for the annual eclipse on October 14, 2023 and the total solar eclipse on April 8, 2024.


Sometimes science and politics overlap in serendipitous ways. One just has to look for them.

The trans-continental 7 August 1869 total eclipse of the Sun was the first for which scientific observation was expected to have a spectroscopic component. It also was the inaugural in the United States at which a significant number of women participated in its study. 

The United States Nautical Almanac Expedition to the path of totality included Professor John Van Vleck (1833-1912; Wesleyan University), who was stationed in Mount Pleasant, Iowa. He was assigned spectroscopic observation, even though he was a neophyte to what eventually would be called an astrophysical technique.

The three minutes of totality simply did not allow for an inexperienced spectroscopist to observe and record what he had seen. Van Vleck needed help and found it close by--down the street from his hotel, where an attorney just starting out had hung a new shingle.

Mansfield (~1870), Credit: Wikipedia

Arabella Mansfield (1846-1911; née Belle Aurelia Babb) volunteered to take notes for Van Vleck. Doing so, she gave up time that otherwise might have been spent viewing the celestial spectacle itself, the first over Iowa in recorded history and the last in a lifetime.


But Mansfield was not new to ‘firsts’. She was the very first female lawyer licensed in the entire country.


Less than 50 kilometers away, Maria Mitchell (1818-1889; Vassar College), the pioneer professional female astronomer in the United States, observed the August 1869 total solar eclipse, too. She did so along with a group of her students and young alumni, the first scientific expedition populated exclusively by women. Here is where the coincidence appears.


The famous professor from New York and the attorney from Iowa do not seem to have met surrounding the event that was the total eclipse. However, both the National Woman Suffrage Association and the Association for the Advancement of Woman began organizing in 1869, and membership lists overlapped. Mansfield would become a member of the former’s executive committee, while the presidency of the latter would be held by Mitchell. In these roles they crossed paths. 


We are reminded that even astronomy looking up—considered esoteric by many—does not take place in a vacuum of progress below.



Thursday, September 7, 2023

Crosspost: A woman who composed the first draft of history finds herself written out of the history books

By Allison Gilbert for CNN

The Smithsonian describes itself as the “world’s largest museum, education, and research complex,” housing nearly 157 million objects, of which less than 1% are on view at its 21 museums. Yet its vast collections are unsearchable by gender. Conducting research to find examples of “women in journalism” (or women working in any endeavor) is generally fruitless. The result? It’s nearly impossible to discover women whose names we don’t yet know.
Photo: Library of Congress


Thankfully, this is changing. The Smithsonian acknowledges that the cataloging of its own materials has been a major factor in women’s stories remaining untold. “The terminology and the systems weren’t there and set up to recognize them,” according to Melanie Adams, newly appointed interim director of the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum, and reported here for the first time. “We now have to fix those systems in order for these stories to be visible.”

Leaders at the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum, created by an Act of Congress in December 2020, point to a massive systemic challenge, as nearly every category of “metadata” — the data about data that enables users to search files — clashes with century-old frameworks that simply wrote women out of the historical record.

This work is critical. According to a major women’s history and social studies research summit, only 24% of the historical figures taught in K-12 classrooms are women. The National Monument Audit found that 3 of the 50 people most frequently honored with public memorials and monuments are female. And just about 1 in 5 biographical entries on English-language Wikipedia focus on women.


Read more at

Thursday, August 17, 2023

Revisited: Honoring the "Mercury 13"

By Nicolle Zellner

Image: Wikipedia
In the early 1960s, 13 high-flying female pilots underwent the same tests given to NASA's newly selected Mercury 7 astronauts. The women lasted longer, withstood higher stresses, and complained less. The privte testing program was abruptly ended at the start of the third phase of testing. 

In June of this year, U.S. Representatives Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), Young Kim (R-CA), Haley Stevens (D-MI), and Debbie Lesko (R-AZ), co-chairs of the Women in STEM Caucus, introduced the Mercury 13 Congressional Gold Medal Act, to recognize the contributions of this group of women, the First Lady Astronaut Trainees (known colloquially as the Mercury 13), to our understanding of the simulated effects of space on women and also, importantly, their example of women in STEM fields. Motivated by their pioneering efforts, in 2018, we published a post, The First Lady Astronaut Trainees: Time for a Congressional Gold Medal. 

It's wonderful to see that this topic has regained momentum, and I encourage you to find and contact your own representatives and ask them to endorse the bill.


Learn more about the bill and listen to the full article at

https://www.dailylocal.com/2023/07/18/women-in-stem-co-chairs-introduce-bill-honoring-female-astronaut-pioneers/




Friday, May 19, 2023

AASWomen Newsletter for May 19, 2023

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of May 19, 2023
eds: Jeremy Bailin, Nicolle Zellner, Sethanne Howard, and Hannah Jang-Condell

[We hope you all are taking care of yourselves and each other. --eds.]

This week's issues:
 Frontispiece to Bryan's astronomy book.
Credit: Fred Zwicky

1. Cross-post: Why Peer Mentors Are Crucial for Women in STEM
2. Mysterious Author of Early Astronomy Textbooks Unveiled – Researcher Uncovers New Details   
3. Gender parity – or not?
4. Why aren’t we acting on the evidence of what works for gender equality?
5. How to Submit to the AASWomen Newsletter
6. How to Subscribe or Unsubscribe to the AASWomen Newsletter
7. Access to Past Issues of the AASWomen Newsletter

An online version of this newsletter will be available at http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/ at 3:00 PM ET every Friday.

Monday, August 3, 2015

Women in Astronomy, 1000 Posts Later

Today marks our 1000th blog post on the Women-in-Astronomy (WiA) blog. I thought I'd use this post to talk about some of the blog's history and where I see our future. Former Bloggers-in-Chief Hannah Jang-Condell and Laura Trouille as well as CSWA chair Joan Schmelz also contributed to this piece. 

This blog was started in 2008 by former CSWA member Hannah Jang-Condell in an effort to reach out to a younger, more socially networked audience. While the CSWA already had a weekly newsletter (AAS Women, sign up here) and a quarterly magazine (Status: A Report on Women in Astronomy), Hannah felt that more informal, shorter posts, would engage a different audience. 

Initially the blog consisted of posts by Hannah sharing her thoughts about women in science, and providing commentary on news items that crossed her path.  It wasn't too long before she realized that she needed help and recruited other members of the CSWA to contribute to WiA.  In 2009 Joan Schmelz and (then-CSWA-chair) Geoff Clayton started contributing posts and Hannah became the first 'Blogger-in-Chief'.

Monday, July 20, 2015

The Fight for Women's Suffrage

I wrote a blog in June on the early women's rights movement in the US and the famous Seneca Falls Convention.  As with the civil rights movement, Quakers played a key role in the push toward equality.  Today I am writing about the fascinating story of the suffrage movement in the late 1800's and early 1900's that gave women the right to vote, and the leadership that Susan B. Anthony provided.


Susan B. Anthony coin first minted in 1979


A resolution was passed at the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention in favor of women voting, but was one of many.  Toward the end of the 19th century, particularly after the civil war (1861 - 1865), suffrage became a focus of the women's movement.  The goal was first to have the Supreme Court rule that women had a constitutional right to vote under the existing US constitution.  When that failed in 1875, the more difficult effort began to amend the constitution.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin

There are a lot of neat people stories in the history of science. I've recently been interested in women astronomers who made major advances but are not as well known as the big 3: Caroline Herschel, Annie Jump Cannon and Henrietta Swan Leavitt. This month I am writing about Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin (1900-1979) who stuck with her convictions to make big discoveries on the nature of stars. She has a really nice autobiography called "The Dyers Hand" (published in the collection "Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin: An Autobiography and Other Recollections") which I found in the Stanford stacks during a recent visit.

Cecilia Payne grew up in Britain and went to University of Cambridge. There, a class by Eddington inspired her to pursue astronomy. Eddington encouraged her to go to the US where there were more opportunities for women. She applied to Harvard and received a fellowship for graduate studies with Shapley.

Monday, May 6, 2013

En'hedu'anna - Our First Great Scientist

This week’s guest blogger is Sethanne Howard, an astronomer who has held positions with U.S. national observatories, NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Navy. She was also Chief of the U.S. Nautical Almanac Office, 2000-2003. Her research specialty is galactic dynamics. She has also been active in science education, especially concentrating on the history of women in science.

Many people, when asked to name an early scientist who is a woman, say Hypatia (Hy-pa-ti'-a). Actually they are about 2700 years too late! Women have been active in science since the beginning of written history. So cast your thoughts backward in time to 4300 years ago. This was the time of Sumer (an ancient civilization in southern Mesopotamia – modern Iraq). Writing had had not been around for very long (developed c. 3000 BCE).

Fortunately we have an abundance of Sumerian literature. They used cuneiform: imprints in damp clay, which was then allowed to harden. Initially the Sumerians used writing primarily as a form of record keeping. The most common cuneiform tablets recorded transactions of daily life: tallies of cattle, sheep, and goats kept by herders for their owners, production figures, lists for taxes, accounts, and contracts – the legalities we use today are not new.