Friday, July 17, 2009

AASWomen for July 17, 2009

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of July 17, 2009
eds. Joan Schmelz, Caroline Simpson & Michele Montgomery

This week's issues:

1. Most Inspirational Women Astronomers?

2. Why Aren't More Women Tenured Science Professors?

3. International Study Shows Implicit Bias Linking Males More Than Females with Science

4. Request for Numbers

5. South Asian Physics Foundation Student Conference Program Announcement

6. Permanent Faculty Position in Astronomy, Florida Institute of Technology

7. Two staff positions at NOAO-South, La Serena, Chile

8. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

9. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN


1. Most Inspirational Women Astronomers?
From: Various

[Last week we asked who you would put in the top ten for most inspirational women astronomer. Here's what you said - Eds.]

From: Jay Pasachoff <Jay.M.Pasachoff_at_williams.edu>

As for Michele Montgomery's posting of NewScientist's top 10 lists of most inspirational woman scientists of all time, I am glad to see that the brief biographies by Naomi Pasachoff (my wife) include #1 on the list both in the Oxford University Press's Portraits in Science series http://www.williams.edu/astronomy/solarcorona/naomi.html and on the American Institute of Physics Website: www.aip.org/history/curie.

But another of her subjects, Barbara McClintock, could arguably be in that top 10 list, ahead of some of the people listed.

From: Anonymous

My take on the NewScientist survery was this: why does there have to be a top 10? Surely if it was put another way - the top 10 males - it simply could not be done as there are so many who have given their contributions to science. The same applies to women - there are far to many to stop at just 10. There would also be a fair few women who are not widely recognised or known about, and perhaps this is a great opportunity to bring out the top 100 women in science and/or astronomy and give a small amount of information about each of them. It would be a fascinating and inspirational read.

From: Hannah at the Women in Astronomy Blog [ http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/ ]

I would also list Caroline Herschel. I like to think that the new infrared space telescope (which just released some first light images today!) is named for her. I also think that Vera Rubin is a living legend in her own right.

Back to top.
2. Why Aren't More Women Tenured Science Professors?
From: Hannah at the Women in Astronomy Blog
[ http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/ ]

From the Scientific American: "Why Aren't More Women Tenured Science Professors?":

Women who apply for tenure-track positions at top-tier research universities in math and sciences these days have a slightly better chance of landing the job than their male colleagues, says a new study funded by the National Science Foundation.

But that's just for those who apply, which is a good tick lower than those who earn PhDs. In chemistry, for example, women made up 32 percent of newly minted PhDs from 1999 to 2003 but accounted for only 18 percent of applicants to tenure-track positions.

Link to full Scientific American article at http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=women-tenured-science-professors

Back to top.
3. Citizens in 34 Countries Show Implicit Bias Linking Males More Than
Females with Science
From:Hannah at the Women in Astronomy Blog
[ http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/ ]

From UVA Today: "Citizens in 34 Countries Show Implicit Bias Linking Males More Than Females with Science":

Implicit stereotypes -- thoughts that people may be unwilling to express or may not even know that they have -- may have a powerful effect on gender equity in science and mathematics engagement and performance, according to a new study published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The international study involving more than half a million participants in 34 countries revealed that 70 percent harbor implicit stereotypes associating science with males more than with females. Moreover, in countries whose citizens stereotyped most strongly, boys achieved at a higher level in eighth-grade science and math.

Full story at http://www.virginia.edu/uvatoday/newsRelease.php?id=9054

Back to top.
4. Request for Numbers
From: Sharon Traweek [traweek_at_history.ucla.edu]

For a proposal research project, I have been seeking data unsuccessfully on the number of US-based women and/or minority post-PhD researchers now working in

*space based astronomy and *land based astronomy.

Ground and space-based research have different funding ecologies. Women/minorities might be distributed among those kinds of projects differently and possibly at different career stages. Within most fields, participants report that women and minorities are distributed among subfields in distinctive ways. However, very few databases identify gender/ethnic distributions among research specializations or by kind of research facilility.

In lieu of any currently available data I would appreciate any informed estimates with the usual multiple caveats.

Back to top.
5. South Asian Physics Foundation Student Conference Program
Announcement
From: WIPHYS, July 10, 2009

The South Asian Physics Foundation is pleased to announce our new Student Conference Program, which provides funds for South Asian physics students to attend international scientific conferences in South Asia. Its purpose is to encourage international contacts, collaborations and broadened perspectives among South Asian physics students while supporting promising research and scholarship. The program is open to all South Asian undergraduate or graduate students in any field of physics who are currently attending university in a South Asian country. Participants will have a unique opportunity to present a scientific paper or poster at a physics or physics-related conference in a South Asian country other than that of the student's university or citizenship.

For more information and an application, please visit our website at www.southasianphysicsfoundation.org.

SAPF is a new nonprofit organization supporting international collaboration in physics in South Asia. We welcome comments and suggestions on this topic.

-- Jessica Hirschfelder and Vidhya Ramachandran, founders

Back to top.
6. Permanent Faculty Position in Astronomy, Florida Institute of
Technology
From: Terry Oswalt [toswalt_at_fit.edu]

The Department of Physics and Space Sciences at the Florida Institute of Technology invites applications for a permanent faculty position that preferably will begin in August 2009. This position may be at any rank, assistant through full professor. Preference will be given to candidates with expertise in observational astronomy and an interest in serving as director of the Ortega Observatory on the FIT campus. The successful candidate will also have guaranteed access to the SARA facilities at Kitt Peak and Cerro Tololo. Candidates with experience in astronomical instrumentation, planetary, galactic and/or extragalactic research are particularly encouraged.

Florida Tech is located on the eastern coast of central Florida, just south of the Kennedy Space Center. Information about the Department can be found at http://cos.fit.edu/pss/ .

To apply, please send a cover letter, CV, statement of research and teaching experience, and the names of at least three references to

searchpss_at_fit.edu or via regular mail to

Faculty Search Committee Dept. of Physics and Space Sciences Florida Institute of Technology 150 W. University Blvd. Melbourne FL 32901 USA.

The review of applications will begin on June 15th, however applications will be accepted until the positions are filled. FIT is an equal opportunity employer.

Back to top.
7. Two staff positions at NOAO-South, La Serena, Chile
From: Nicole S. van der Bliek [nvdbliek_at_ctio.noao.edu]

Assistant or Associate Astronomer, Job No. 949 Scientist, Job No. 950

Excerpt of the job postings For full postings see: http://www.ctio.noao.edu

The National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) invites applications for two scientific staff positions, both based at NOAO-South, the site of the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO), in La Serena, Chile.

The astronomer position is a tenure track position, with up to 50% time for individual research and 50% time devoted to observatory duties. The scientist position is a parallel track position, with up to 20% for individual research and 80% time devoted to observatory duties.

The ideal candidates will be observational astronomers with several years of experience in astronomical instrumentation and instrument support. Specific interest in opical spectroscopy and/or infrared imaging and spectroscopy is advantageous, but all skill sets relevant to CTIO will be considered. Familiarity with modern observatory operations and scientific data management will also be favorable considered in the selection process.

Applicants will be considered at all levels. NOAO is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. AURA and NOAO actively support efforts to broaden participation in all Observatory activities. Women and candidates from underrepresented minorities are particularly encouraged to apply.

Applications received prior to September 1, 2009 are assured of full consideration; however, the position will remain open until filled. Applications should include a curriculum vita; a statement of current professional interests and how those interests align with the NOAO program; and the names of three references. When applying for this position please refer to the job title and job number above. Application materials should be submitted electronically (preferred) to hrnoao_at_noao.edu, or by mail to address below.

Further details can be obtained from the Director for CTIO, Dr. R. Chris Smith (director_at_ctio.noao.edu). Profiles of some NOAO Scientists and Astronomers have been posted on the NOAO webpages, to give potential applicants a snapshot of what these positions involve and what it is like to work at NOAO. Please see http://www.noao.edu/staffdir/profiles.php

Send resume to:

Human Resources Office National Optical Astronomy Observatory P.O. Box 26732 Tucson, Arizona 85726-6732 Email: hrnoao_at_noao.edu FAX: 520-318-8494

Back to top.
8. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

[Please remember to replace "_at_" in the below e-mail addresses.]

To submit to AASWOMEN: send email to aaswomen_at_aas.org

All material sent to that address will be posted unless you tell us otherwise (including your email address).

To subscribe or unsubscribe to AASWOMEN go to

http://lists.aas.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aaswlist

and fill out the form.

If you experience any problems, please email itdept_at_aas.org

Back to top.
9. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

Past issues of AASWOMEN are available at

http://www.aas.org/cswa/AASWOMEN.html

Each annual summary includes an index of topics covered.

Back to top.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Quick links

I'm a little behind the times with these articles, but here goes:

Women who apply for tenure-track positions at top-tier research universities in math and sciences these days have a slightly better chance of landing the job than their male colleagues, says a new study funded by the National Science Foundation.

But that's just for those who apply, which is a good tick lower than those who earn PhDs. In chemistry, for example, women made up 32 percent of newly minted PhDs from 1999 to 2003 but accounted for only 18 percent of applicants to tenure-track positions.


From UVA Today: "Citizens in 34 Countries Show Implicit Bias Linking Males More Than Females with Science":
Implicit stereotypes – thoughts that people may be unwilling to express or may not even know that they have – may have a powerful effect on gender equity in science and mathematics engagement and performance, according to a new study published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The international study involving more than half a million participants in 34 countries revealed that 70 percent harbor implicit stereotypes associating science with males more than with females. Moreover, in countries whose citizens stereotyped most strongly, boys achieved at a higher level in eighth-grade science and math.
(h/t: Alice of Alice's Astro Info)

Friday, July 10, 2009

Most Inspirational Women Astronomers

From today's AASWOMEN:
4. Most Inspirational Women Astronomers
From: Joan Schmelz [jschmelz_at_memphis.edu]
[Last week's item from the NewScientist survey on "Most Inspirational Woman Scientist Revealed" triggered several comments. Perhaps we should come up with a list of inspirational women astronomers. Who would you put in the top ten? - Eds.]

Jocelyn Bell Burnell was #4 on the NewScientist list.

One AASWOMEN reader wanted to know, "Where is Cecilia Payne, perhaps the greatest astronomer and one of the greatest scientists of the 20th century?"

What about Henrietta Leavitt, Maria Mitchell, and Annie Cannon? All three inspired me.
I would also list Caroline Herschel. I like to think that the new infrared space telescope (which just released some first light images today!) is named for her. I also think that Vera Rubin is a living legend in her own right.

Your turn, blog readers: who would you consider the most inspirational women astronomers?

AASWOMEN for July 10, 2009

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of July 10, 2009
eds. Joan Schmelz, Caroline Simpson & Michele Montgomery

This week's issues:

1. Engineering Pamphlet for Girls

2. Professional Skills Development Workshop

3. Field Theory

4. Most Inspirational Woman Astronomers?

5. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

6. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN


1. Engineering Pamphlet for Girls
From: Joan Schmelz [jschmelz_at_memphis.edu]

A colleague of mine sent me this link to an engineering pamphlet for girls:

http://engineeryourlife.org/cms/8750.aspx?subpage=10324

While exploring the web site, I found this:

A coalition of more than 55 engineering organizations set out to discover why so few academically prepared high school girls were entering engineering programs, and what could be done to increase their numbers. Two findings stood out:

(1) Girls (as well as their parents, teachers, and counselors) believe that engineers must be exceptional at both math and science and that engineering is difficult and challenging.

(2) It is the engineering community that is contributing to their limited understanding of the profession.

Rather than conveying what it's like to be an engineer, and sharing what we love about the field with young people, we tend to discuss the process of becoming an engineer, concentrating on the necessary qualifications and emphasizing all of the potential hurdles along the way. What's emphasized to girls (and boys) is how challenging the process is, not the reasons one would want to become an engineer in the first place. In a well-meaning effort to arm potential engineers with a healthy dose of realism, we often forget to also convey what is attractive and meaningful about the profession.

Changing just a few words would make this directly relevant to astronomy. For all of us teaching undergraduates, mentoring an REU student, doing outreach in local schools, etc. remember this advice from our engineering sisters and brothers: share what you love about being an astronomer!

If you've lost that love in the hustle and bustle of everyday life - proposal deadlines, grading exams, applying for your next job, etc. - take some time to rediscover it. It will not only be good for you personally but also for the next generation of astronomers.

Back to top.
2. Professional Skills Development Workshop
From: Hannah at the Women in Astronomy Blog

[From http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/2009/07/professional-skills-development.html ]

Mark your calendars: here's a heads up for those of you planning to attend the Women in Astronomy Meeting in College Park, MD on October 21-23. There will be a professional skills development workshop held the day before the meeting, on October 20, on the topic of Negotiation. The workshop is intended primarily at postdocs, but graduate students and young faculty may be accommodated depending on space.

Back to top.
3. Field Theory
From: Hannah at the Women in Astronomy Blog

http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/2009/07/field-theory.html

Back to top.
4. Most Inspirational Women Astronomers?
From: Joan Schmelz [jschmelz_at_memphis.edu]

[Last week's item from the NewScientist survey on "Most Inspirational Woman Scientist Revealed" triggered several comments. Perhaps we should come up with a list of inspirational women astronomers. Who would you put in the top ten? - Eds.]

Jocelyn Bell Burnell was #4 on the NewScientist list.

One AASWOMEN reader wanted to know, "Where is Cecilia Payne, perhaps the greatest astronomer and one of the greatest scientists of the 20th century?"

What about Henrietta Leavitt, Maria Mitchell, and Annie Cannon? All three inspired me.

Back to top.
5. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

To submit to AASWOMEN: send email to aaswomen_at_aas.org. All material sent to that address will be posted unless you tell us otherwise (including your email address).

To subscribe or unsubscribe to AASWOMEN go to

http://lists.aas.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aaswlist

and fill out the form.

If you experience any problems, please email itdept_at_aas.org

Back to top.
6. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

Past issues of AASWOMEN are available at

http://www.aas.org/cswa/AASWOMEN.html

Each annual summary includes an index of topics covered.

Back to top.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Professional Skills Development Workshop

Mark your calendars: here's a heads up for those of you planning to attend the Women in Astronomy Meeting in College Park, MD on October 21-23. There will be a professional skills development workshop held the day before the meeting, on October 20, on the topic of Negotiation. The workshop is intended primarily at postdocs, but graduate students and young faculty may be accommodated depending on space.

For updates and information, email Hannah Jang-Condell at hannah at astro dot umd dot edu.

Friday, July 3, 2009

AASWOMEN for July 3, 2009

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of July 3, 2009
eds. Joan Schmelz, Caroline Simpson & Michele Montgomery

This week's issues:

1. Draft AAS Statement On Professional Ethics

2. Lunar and Solar Eclipses in July

3. Most inspirational woman scientist revealed

4. Wiki on Women Astronomers

5. ASP Conference and Workshop Scholarship Deadline Extended

6. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

7. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN


1. Draft AAS Statement On Professional Ethics
From: AAS

The AAS has drafted a statement on professional ethics on June 7, 2009 (see below). AAS members are asked to login to the AAS Forum at

http://forums.aas.org/

and provide comments. The comments will appear online after a moderator has approved them.

AAS Statement on Professional Ethics: The mission of the American Astronomical Society is to enhance and share humanity's scientific understanding of the Universe. We believe the advancement of astronomy requires that we provide ethical guidelines for AAS members and, for that matter, anyone involved in professional astronomical activities.

Every astronomer is a citizen of the community of science. Each shares responsibility for the welfare of this community. We endorse the statement of the American Physical Society that "Science is best advanced when there is mutual trust, based upon honest behavior, throughout the community." All scientists should act ethically in the conduct of their research, in teaching and education, and in relations with both members of the public and other members of the scientific community. We have a special responsibility to students and postdocs to train them in ethical conduct.

The American Astronomical Society believes that the following are the minimal standards of ethical behavior relating to the profession.

CONDUCT TOWARDS OTHERS

All people encountered in one's professional life should be treated with respect. Discourse should be civil. Scientists should work to provide an environment that encourages the free expression and exchange of scientific ideas. They should promote equality of opportunity and treatment for all their colleagues, regardless of gender, race, ethnic origin, religion, age, marital status, sexual orientation, disabilities, or any other reason not related to scientific merit. This principle is clearly stated in our By-Laws.

More senior members of the society, especially research supervisors, have a special responsibility to facilitate the research, educational, and professional development of students and subordinates. This includes providing safe, supportive working environments, fair compensation and appropriate acknowledgment of their contribution to any research results. In addition, supervisors should encourage the timely advance of graduate students and young professionals in their career aspirations.

It is also incumbent on senior members of our society to inform more junior members of these ethical issues and of institutional and government guidelines, policies and precedures related to the oversight and maintenance of ethical standards for research and conduct. It is the responsibility of all members of our society to familiarize themselves with such guidelines, policies and procedures.

RESEARCH

It is an ethical responsiblity that research results be recorded and maintained in a form that allows review, analysis, and reproduction by others. It is incumbent on researchers involved in large, publicly-supported studies to make results available in a timely manner.

Fabrication of data or selective reporting of data with the intent to mislead or deceive is unethical and unacceptable, as is the appropriation of data or research results from others without permission and attribution.

It should be recognized that honest error is an integral part of the scientific enterprise. It is not unethical to be wrong, provided that errors are promptly acknowledged and corrected when they are detected.

PUBLICATION AND AUTHORSHIP PRACTICES

All persons who have made significant contributions to a work intended for publication should be offered the opportunity to be listed as authors. This includes all those who have contributed intellectually to the inception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. Other individuals who have contributed to a study should be appropriately acknowledged. The sources of financial support for any project should be acknowledged/disclosed. All collaborators share responsibility for any paper they coauthor, and every coauthor should have the opportunity to review a manuscript before its submission.

Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given, and complete referencing is an essential part of any astronomical research publication. Authors have an obligation to their colleagues and the scientific community to include a set of references that communicates the precedents, sources, and context of the reported work. Deliberate omission of a pertinent author or reference is unacceptable. Data provided by others must be cited appropriately, even if obtained from a public database.

All authors are responsible for providing prompt corrections or retractions if errors are found in published works.

Plagiarism is the presentation of others' words, ideas or scientific results as if they were one's own. Citations to others' work must be clear, complete, and correct. Plagiarism is unethical behavior and is never acceptable.

Authors, editors and referees should also be aware of the professional and ethical standards that have been adopted for the AAS journals ( http://aas.org/ethicsPolicy ).

PEER REVIEW

Peer review is an essential component of many aspects of the scientific process such as evaluating research proposals, publishing research results, and evaluating colleagues for career advancement.

Peer review can serve its intended function only if the members of the scientific community are prepared to provide thorough, fair, and objective evaluations based on requisite expertise. Although peer review can be difficult and time-consuming, scientists have an obligation to participate in the process.

Reviewers should disclose conflicts of interest resulting from direct competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with those they are reviewing and recuse themselves from cases where such conflicts preclude an objective evaluation. It is unethical to seek to gain an advantage by means of reviewing the work of others.

Privileged information or ideas that are obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for competitive gain.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Many activities of scientists and educators have the potential for a conflict of interest. Any professional relationship or action that may either be or be perceived as a conflict of interest should be fully disclosed. Most organizations or activities have mechanisms for managing conflicts, for example, through recusal. If a conflict of interest cannot be properly managed, the activity should be avoided or discontinued.

Back to top.
2. Lunar and Solar Eclipses in July
From: Michele Montgomery [montgomery_at_physics.ucf.edu]

July 7, 2009 is a penumbral lunar eclipse and July 22, 2009 is the longest solar eclipse of this century. To check whether you are in the right location to view these eclipses, see

http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/OH/OH2009.html .

Back to top.
3. Most inspirational woman scientist revealed
From: Michele Montgomery [montgomery_at_physics.ucf.edu]

NewScientist Magazine issue 2715 dated July 2, 2009 lists the top 10 most inspirational woman scientists of all time. Physics took the number 1 spot and astrophysics took the 4th. Do you agree with this list and the order? See

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327156.600-most-inspirational-woman-scientist-revealed.html .

Back to top.
4. Wiki on Women Astronomers
From: Michele Montgomery [montgomery_at_physics.ucf.edu]

A wiki has been started on women astronomers. Is anyone missing? Are you missing?

http://astronomycompendium.wikispaces.com/Women+Astronomers

Back to top.
5. ASP Conference and Workshop Scholarship Deadline Extended
From: Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Although the regular abstract submission deadline to the September 12-16 ASP annual meeting has passed, limited space for late abstract proposals may be available. Submit inquiries or your late abstract to 2009meeting_at_astrosociety.org before July 31, 2009.

ASP is also hosting a series of workshops the weekend prior to the ASP annual meeting. The workshops,

http://www.astrosociety.org/events/2009mtg/workshops.html ,

are for teachers, informal educators, and amateur astronomers engaged in public outreach. Thanks to the support of the Spitzer Space Center, a limited number of up-to-$750 scholarships are available to eligible participants to help defray travel and lodging costs. The workshop scholarship deadline is July 22, 2009.

Back to top.
6. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

[Please remember to replace "" in the below e-mail addresses.]

To submit to AASWOMEN: send email to aaswomenaas.org All material sent to that address will be posted unless you tell us otherwise (including your email address).

To subscribe or unsubscribe to AASWOMEN go to

http://lists.aas.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aaswlist

and fill out the form.

If you experience any problems, please email itdept_at_aas.org

Back to top.
7. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

Past issues of AASWOMEN are available at

http://www.aas.org/cswa/AASWOMEN.html

Each annual summary includes an index of topics covered.

Back to top.

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Field Theory

This week, I had the pleasure of playing in the Mud Cup, the semi-annual soccer game played between the two departments at my former place of employment. One of the rules we have adopted is that each team must field a minimum of two women at any time. This form of affirmative action is necessary because while we can claim equality in terms of intellectual ability, you can't get around the fact that men are generally faster and stronger. It's meant to be a friendly game of soccer rather than a high-stakes competition, and we women would like to get the chance to play, hence the rule.

At the post-game party, I got to talking with a friend who coaches his sons' soccer teams. One year, his team practiced at the same time and place as a girls' team. The coaches got the teams together to play scrimmages against each other. My friend noted that the boys would either get super-aggressive against the girls, or back off completely. "These guys here do the same thing," I replied, indicating the soccer players around us.

It seems to me that this sort of attitude carries over from the soccer field into science, too. Some male scientists feel threatened by women who compete with them, and aggressively attack the women's ideas. Some take a condescending attitude toward women scientists, along the lines of, "oh how cute, she's trying to act like a scientist," and they dismiss the women's ideas altogether. Fortunately, though, there are also those who treat us with respect as colleagues, or even competitors, on an equal footing.

To conclude, I'll mention that while my team was vastly outnumbered by our opponents, meaning that we had far fewer players to substitute in. We ended up having to substitute women in for men, and by the end we had five women on the field to their three. Still, we came out victorious. It only goes to show that women's contributions can be invaluable, whether on the soccer field, or in the field of science.