I recently heard an interview with Paul Tough,
author of How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity and the Hidden Power of Character.
The upshot of this book is that success in college in beyond
depends less on IQ or however it is you decide to measure academic
intelligence, but more on character traits like persistence and optimism.
This is in line with studies of delayed gratification, where researchers found
that pre-schoolers who were able to resist eating a marshmallow
were more successful later in life.
I've certainly seen my share of anecdotal evidence of the
importance of persistence in achieving success.
The kids who were at the top of class in elementary school getting to high
school and deciding that honors geometry was too hard.
The students who entered college as pre-med majors graduating with
English degrees.
They all had been used to getting by pretty easily, but at some point
they hit a wall, and decided that rather than trying to scale it,
they would turn aside. But many of
the students that were behind those
leaders, who were used to things being hard for them, would
come to that wall, see it as just another wall, and surpass
the students who had coasted along up to that point.
I'd also say that the analogy applies to success in astronomy.
Especially in these tough economic times, the people who end up
getting permanent positions are the ones who just keep on applying
for jobs year after year after year, not necessarily the ones
who do the best science.
Now, suppose you are a girl interested in pursuing science, and
you encounter a wall. And suppose someone tells you that
you can't climb that wall, because you're a girl. Or that
if you climb that wall, the boys won't like you. Or you
see that none of your friends are climbing it.
There are lots of easier paths for you away from the wall.
Suppose you are a woman applying for postdocs in astronomy.
Your wall is just a bit higher than your male peers, because
of unconscious bias. You get a little less support for climbing
that wall, because your graduate mentor seems more interested
in grooming his male students than yourself.
You have troubling syncing your wall-climbing with your spouse.
You don't see many other women climbing the wall.
The paths away from your wall are well-trodden, not to mention
that it's especially difficult to climb the wall with a baby.
I guess my point is that persistence is a huge factor in success in
any endeavor, and women have to persist harder to succeed in
science. I'd like to see both a more level playing field,
and more support for women in climbing over the barriers to success.
The AAS Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy maintains this blog to disseminate information relevant to astronomers who identify as women and share the perspectives of astronomers from varied backgrounds. If you have an idea for a blog post or topic, please submit a short pitch (less than 300 words). The views expressed on this site are not necessarily the views of the CSWA, the AAS, its Board of Trustees, or its membership.
1 comment :
Aww! My comment didn't get through. I'll restate it, from despair.com, "Quitters never win and winners never quit, but those who never win and never quit are idiots." I actually think this is really relevant, although not just for women. For astronomers in general. You may be a persistent post-doc 10 years past your PhD, and when your funding runs out, you are going to be in big trouble. I say this as someone who left the field several years ago and am seeing people run into this. Not saying they won't get a job somewhere, somehow, but they will definitely be in a worse position financially, emotionally, and family-wise than if they had made a switch years earlier.
Persistence taken to the extreme is folly. I hope women are smart enough to hit the sweet spot. They may get more of what they want out of life in other pursuits besides academic astronomy.
Post a Comment