Saturday, January 31, 2009

AASWOMEN Newsletter 01/30/09

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of January 30, 2009
eds. Joan Schmelz, Caroline Simpson, & Michele Montgomery
This week's issues:

1. Women in Astronomy Blog Highlights Jan 23, 2009 - Leavitt Law

2. Facebook Gets a New Member - Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy

3. President Barack Obama Signs Equal-Pay Bill

4. Chronicle of Higher Education article on U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Limiting Title IX Lawsuits

5. AWIS Press Release - Elsevier Grant on Leading Women to Create Their Own Personal Work/Life Balance

6. Increased Funds for Childcare at APS Meetings

7. Research Internship for Undergraduate Women

8. APS March Meeting Special Events

9. Associate Project Scientist, James Webb Space Telescope

10. Full-time, Tenure-track, Astronomy, LOS RIOS Community College District

11. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

12. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN


1. Women in Astronomy Blog Highlights Jan 23, 2009 - Leavitt Law
From: Joan Schmelz

The AAS Council recognized the 100th anniversary of Henrietta Leavitt?s first presentation of the Cepheid Period-Luminosity relation, a seminal discovery in astronomy that continues to have great significance. The Council was pleased to learn of a resolution adopted by the organizers of the Leavitt symposium, "Thanks to Henrietta Leavitt," held Nov. 6, 2008 at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA. There, it was suggested that this important relation now be referred to as the ?Leavitt Law.? The Council recognized that the AAS has no authority to define astronomical nomenclature, but it would be happy to see this designation used widely.

For details of the symposium, please see:

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/events/2008/leavitt/

Back to top.
2. Facebook Gets a New Member - Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy
From: Geoff Clayton

[Become a Facebook fan of the Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy at

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Committee-on-the-Status-of-Women-in-Astronomy/43977374494

and meet other fans.]

Back to top.
3. President Barack Obama Signs Equal-Pay Bill
From: Philip Elliot, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Barack Obama is signing into law an equal-pay bill that is popular with labor and women's groups and is expected to make it easier for workers to sue for decades-old discrimination.

Obama was to sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on Thursday during an East Room ceremony, a move that effectively ends a 2007 Supreme Court decision that said workers had only 180 days to file a pay-discrimination lawsuit. Obama and fellow Democrats campaigned hard against the court decision and promised to pass legislation that would give workers more time to sue their employers for past discrimination.

"This bill will be a big step forward not just for women, but for families," the White House said in a statement announcing the bill signing. "It is not only a measure of fairness, but can be the difference for families struggling to make ends meet during these difficult times."

The law is named for a woman who said she didn't become aware of a pay discrepancy until she neared the end of her 19-year career at a Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Ala. She sued, but the Supreme Court in 2007 said she missed her chance.

The court said in a 5-4 ruling that a person must file a claim of discrimination within 180 days of a company's initial decision to pay a worker less than it pays another worker doing the same job. Under the new bill, given final passage in Congress this week, every new discriminatory paycheck would extend the statute of limitations for another 180 days.

Congress attempted to update the law to extend the time, but the Bush White House and Senate Republicans blocked the legislation in the last session of Congress

Opponents contended the legislation would gut the statute of limitations, encourage lawsuits and be a boon to trial lawyers. They also argued that employees could wait to file claims in hopes of reaping larger damage awards. The bill does not change current law limiting back pay for claimants to two years.

Obama, who took office on Jan. 20, spoke strongly in support of it during his campaign and the Democratic-controlled Congress moved it to the top of the agenda for the new session that opened this month.

Obama aides said Ledbetter would attend the bill signing ceremony in the East Room, followed by a separate reception with first lady Michelle Obama.

The Ledbetter bill focuses on pay and other workplace discrimination against women. The Census Bureau last year estimated that women still receive only about 78 cents for every dollar that men get for doing equivalent jobs. But the measure, which amends the 1964 Civil Rights Act, also applies to discrimination based on factors such as race, religion, national origin, disability or age.

Ledbetter was a tireless spokeswoman for the law and Obama's candidacy. She addressed the Democratic National Convention in Denver last year and traveled to Washington aboard Obama's train for the inauguration ceremonies. The law will not help Ledbetter recover any money; instead, she said she owed it to other women to champion the cause.

"There will be a far richer reward if we secure fair pay," she said in Denver. "For our children and grandchildren, so that no one will ever again experience the discrimination that I did."

Back to top.
4. Chronicle of Higher Education article: "U.S. Supreme Court Rules
Against Limiting Title IX Lawsuits" by Eric Kelderman
From: The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 21, 2009

Washington ? A unanimous Supreme Court today ruled against imposing more limits on sexual-discrimination and sexual-harassment lawsuits.

Today?s decision overturns a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee. The appeals court found that lawsuits filed under Title IX, the 1972 law that prohibits sex discrimination at institutions that receive federal funds, could not also include claims of civil-rights violations under a Civil War-era federal law, Section 1983, that enforces the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.

But Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who wrote the opinion for all nine justices, said that the two statutes were not mutually exclusive because each offers different protections and penalties. Claims under Section 1983 can be filed against individuals, for example, while Title IX lawsuits can be filed only against institutions.

?Because Title IX?s protections are narrower in some respects and broader in others than those guaranteed under the equal-protection clause, the court cannot agree with the First Circuit that Congress saw Title IX as the sole means of correcting unconstitutional gender discrimination in schools,? Justice Alito wrote.

The original suit had been filed by the parents of a kindergarten student in Hyannis, Mass., who charged that a third-grader had repeatedly forced their daughter to expose herself to him and to other students on a school bus during a six-month period in the 2000-1 school year.

A federal district-court judge in Massachusetts ruled that the student had faced sexual harassment that was ?severe and pervasive? but that the school had not violated Title IX because the harassment stopped after school officials found out about the misconduct. The judge also dismissed the parents? claims, under the equal-protection clause, ?that the school discriminated on the basis of sex in both the investigation and proposed remedy.? A three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the lower court?s rulings.

Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has reversed the appeals court?s decision, the lower courts will still have to decide on the merits of the parents? charges of constitutional violations under the equal-protection clause.

The American Association of University Professors had signed on to a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the plaintiffs, who wanted the Supreme Court to overturn the appeals-court decision. Other groups that supported the plaintiffs include the American Bar Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the National Women?s Law Center. ?Eric Kelderman

Back to top.
5. AWIS Press Release - Elsevier Grant on Leading Women to Create
Their Own Personal Work/Life Balance
From: AWIS Jan. 2009

The Association for Women in Science (AWIS) has received a three-year grant from the Elsevier Foundation in the amount of $105,000 for a new project: "AWIS Leading Women to Create Their Own Personal Work/Life Balance."

The grant will be used to develop an educational/support program, including a toolkit with supplementary resources and extended coaching to enable AWIS' 51 chapters around the county to help early-to mid-career women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learn to effectively manage their personal and professional lives. Building on an established network, this three year project will address the critical career points when women's attrition from STEM fields is highest.

"Significant progress has been made in improving the status of women within the scientific workforce over the past 30 years, particularly in regards to training," said Janet Bandows Koster, AWIS executive director. "At each stage of advancement, however, from postdoctoral training to first position to tenure and beyond, the proportion of women represented drops off substantially." According to a 2007 report by the National Academy of Sciences, this exodus is linked to issues related to starting a family and inability to establish a satisfactory work/life balance.

AWIS will launch the Personal Work/Life Balance program with a workshop titled "Learn to Juggle Without Joining the Circus: Strategies to Deal with Your Career and Work-Life Balance Challenges." The event takes place on Monday, February 16, 2009 from 7:30 am - 11:30 am at the Hyatt Regency Chicago, in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Back to top.
6. Increased Funds for Childcare at APS Meetings
From: WIPHYS Jan. 27, 2009

The Committee on the Status of Women in Physics is pleased to announce that it has received a grant from the Elsevier Foundation's New Scholars program which will allow it to make awards of up to $400 to APS meeting attendees who are bringing small children or who incur extra expenses in leaving them at home (i.e., extra daycare or babysitting services). Details at

http://www.aps.org/meetings/march/services/childcare.cfm

(March meeting, Pittsburgh) and

http://www.aps.org/meetings/april/events/index.cfm

(April meeting, Denver).

The grant from Elsevier augments existing funds from the APS and allows the committee to increase both the number and the amount of the awards.

Back to top.
7. Research Internship for Undergraduate Women
From: WIPHYS Jan. 26, 2009

Information on the 2009 APS/IBM Research Internship for Undergraduate Women is now available! These summer internships are salaried positions typically 10 weeks long, and include in addition a $2,500 grant, plus the opportunity to work with a mentor at one of three IBM research locations. Applications must be submitted by February 15, 2009. Complete details on the program and how to apply are available at

http://www.aps.org/programs/women/scholarships/ibm/index.cfm

Back to top.
8. APS March Meeting Special Events
From: WIPHYS Jan. 27, 2009

The Committee on the Status of Women in Physics is sponsoring or co-sponsoring a variety of special events on Tuesday, March 17 at the APS March annual meeting in Pittsburgh, PA.

1) CSWP/FIAP Networking Breakfast for Women in Physics (7:30-9:30 am, Westin Hotel) Full buffet breakfast and an informal speaker. Both men and women are welcome to attend. Pre-registration by March 2 is strongly encouraged

http://www.aps.org/meetings/march/events/receptions/cswp-fiap.cfm .

2) Panel Discussion J4: Around the World in 180 Minutes, (11:14 am - 2:15 pm, Convention Center) Sponsored by the Committee on the Status of Women in Physics and the Forum on International Physics.

3) COM/CSWP Reception (6:00 pm - 7:30 pm, Westin Hotel). Learn about the work of the Committee on Minorities in Physics and the Committee on the Status of Women in Physics, network with colleagues, and unwind after a long day of sessions. All are welcome to join us.

Back to top.
9. Associate Project Scientist, James Webb Space Telescope
From: Jonathan Gardner [jonathan.p.gardner_at_nasa.gov]

The Observational Cosmology Laboratory of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center invites applications for a civil service astrophysicist position in astronomical instrumentation. The successful candidate will join the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) project science team as the Associate Project Scientist for Assembly, Integration, Test and Commissioning (I&T) of the observatory [at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center].

The successful candidate will work with the JWST project team to validate the instrumentation, telescope and observatory as they undergo I&T, paying particular attention to the thermal design. The incumbent will also carry out a program of scientific research relevant to the JWST science objectives.

Desired qualifications include a PhD degree, a scientific publication record in astronomy and/or astronomical instrumentation and experience working with cryogenic space-flight mission hardware. The appointment will be made at the GS-14 or GS-15 level within the US government civil service.

For more information, see the AAS job bulletin position 25420 or contact Jonathan Gardner at 301-286-3938 or jonathan.p.gardner_at_nasa.gov. NASA is an Equal Employment Opportunity employer and a diversity of candidates is sought. Expressions of interest are due Feb. 28, 2009; additional application materials will be required. US Citizenship is required.

Back to top.
10. Full-time (Tenure Track) positions in Astronomy, LOS RIOS
Community College District
From: The Chronicle of Higher Education

The Los Rios Community College District's four colleges [American River College, Cosumnes River College, Folsom Lake College, Sacramento City College] serve the greater Sacramento region. With a student population of approximately 90,000 and a service area of 2,400 square miles, the District is the second largest in California and is one of the top statewide in transferring students to the UC and CSU systems. In addition, the district provides 76 two-year vocational programs and 63 technical certificate programs. Our District offers excellent salaries and benefits and encourages and promotes the continuous professional development of all. Los Rios Community College District is a past recipient of the Sacramento Workplace Excellence Leader Award.

LRCCD is currently recruiting for the following, full-time, tenure-track faculty positions: Astronomy [among many others]. For details, see

www.losrios.edu

for indepth job descriptions and instructions for applying online. EOE.

Back to top.
11. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

[Please remember to replace "_at_" in the below e-mail addresses.]

To submit to AASWOMEN: send email to aaswomen_at_aas.org All material sent to that address will be posted unless you tell us otherwise (including your email address).

To subscribe or unsubscribe to AASWOMEN go to

http://lists.aas.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aaswomen

and fill out the form.

If you experience any problems, please email itdept_at_aas.org

Back to top.
12. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

Past issues of AASWOMEN are available at

http://www.aas.org/cswa/AASWOMEN.html

Each annual summary includes an index of topics covered.

Back to top.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Leavitt Law

The AAS Council recognized the 100th anniversary of Henrietta Leavitt’s first presentation of the Cepheid Period-Luminosity relation, a seminal discovery in astronomy that continues to have great significance.  The Council was pleased to learn of a resolution adopted by the organizers of the Leavitt symposium, "Thanks to Henrietta Leavitt," held Nov. 6, 2008 at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA. There, it was suggested that this important relation now be referred to as the “Leavitt Law.” The Council recognized that the AAS has no authority to define astronomical nomenclature, but it would be happy to see this designation used widely.

For details of the symposium, please see:

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/events/2008/leavitt/

AASWomen for January 23, 2009

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of January 23, 2009
eds. Joan Schmelz, Caroline Simpson, & Michele Montgomery

This week's issues:

1. AASWomen Childcare Update

2. Assistant Professor, University of Manitoba

3. Postdoctoral Position, Caltech/Spitzer Science Center

4. Astronomer/Planetarium Director, St. Cloud State University

*** FOLLOWING TAKEN FROM WIPHYS ***

5. NYT article on New Hope for Lifting Women in Science

6. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

7. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN


1. AASWomen Childcare...details to be determined
From: Kevin Marvel [kevin.marvel_at_aas.org]

Thanks for the notice in the latest AAS Women email news about the Council's commitment to provide childcare service at the next three AAS winter meetings. The details have yet to be worked out, so some of the numbers described by Council members at the Long Beach meeting may not be the actual final numbers, but actually represent the most optimistic price point we hope to reach. This especially bears on the cost per hour of the service to the users.

That said, it is my intention to make the service as affordable as possible for potential users. I welcome help from CSWA members and supporters as well as any other AAS member in finding and securing financial support for the service. If you have a lead, can make a personal commitment or a commitment on behalf of your employer, please contact me directly at marvel_at_aas.org. Such a service is not overly expensive from nearly any point of view, but it does represent a new and real cost that the Society must bear. I am counting on my fellow Council members to help secure the funds for this new service and know I can count on the enthusiastic support of many others in our Society, not just the CSWA in this regard as well.

Back to top.
2. Assistant Professor, Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Manitoba
From: Jayanne English [Jayanne_English_at_umanitoba.ca], Dec. 22, 2008

The Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Manitoba invites applications for a tenure-track Assistant Professor position in theoretical/computational astrophysics at the University of Manitoba, beginning July 1, 2009 or as soon as possible thereafter.

We seek outstanding individuals who will complement and expand current research areas, which include the study of formation and evolution of galaxies, supernova remnants, neutron stars, magnetars, pulsar wind nebulae, star formation, and gravitational lensing. Candidates should have a strong record of achievement in astrophysics research, and a commitment to excellence in undergraduate and graduate teaching in physics and astronomy. Applicants should send curriculum vitae, a list of publications, a summary of past accomplishments and future research plans, and the names of three referees to: Dr. Peter Blunden ( blunden_at_physics.umanitoba.ca), Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada. Further information is available at http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca. Please quote position 09192.

The University of Manitoba encourages applications from qualified women and men, including members of visible minorities, Aboriginal peoples, and persons with disabilities. All qualified candidates are encouraged to apply; however, Canadians and permanent residents will be given priority. Review of applications will begin March 1, 2009, and will continue until the position is filled. This position is subject to final budgetary approval. Application materials, including letters of reference, will be handled in accordance with Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (Manitoba).

Back to top.
3. Postdoctoral Position, Caltech/Spitzer Science Center
From: Kartik Sheth [astrokartik_at_gmail.com]

Applications are invited for one post-doctoral research position at Caltech / Spitzer Science Center. The successful applicant will work with Dr. Kartik Sheth and the S4G (Spitzer Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies) team. S4G is designed to be the ultimate legacy survey for the distribution of stellar structure in the nearby universe (http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/geninfo/es/p60007_obs_summary.pdf) . Using IRAC Channels 1 and 2 over the two year Spitzer warm mission, we will obtain extremely deep observations of the stellar mass distribution for a sample of ~2,300 nearby (d<40Mpc) galaxies (dwarfs, ellipticals, irregular, spirals), thus assembling an unprecedented dataset for studies of structure formation during galaxy evolution. The successful applicant is expected to become an integral and equal member of the team. S/he will work with the team members to reduce, analyze and verify the data, design and deliver the data products for the community. The ideal candidate will also design and pursue a vigorous, independent science research program primarily using the S4G data. S/he may also envision using and/or obtaining data from new observations or existing surveys (e.g., COSMOS, SDSS) to complement the proposed science. Applicants are encouraged to research the survey, discuss the goals with any of the co-Is and formulate an ambitious research proposal, which should be submitted as part of the application package.

Candidates should have obtained, by the starting date, a Ph.D. in astronomy, physics or equivalent, in an area relevant to these projects. The appointment is for two years (with the possibility of a renewal for a further year) and could start as early as May 2009.

To apply, please send a cover letter describing your interest in the position, a curriculum vitae, publication list, a statement of past research and a detailed proposed research statement, as described above. Please also have 3 letters of recommendation sent independently to Dr. Sheth kartik_at_astro.caltech.edu by March 1, 2009.

Caltech is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer. Women, Minorities, Veterans, and Disabled Persons are encouraged to apply.

Back to top.
4. Astronomer/Planetarium Director, St. Cloud State University
From: Maria Womack [mariawomack_at_gmail.com]

Probationary (Tenure-track) position for Astronomer/Planetarium Director, St. Cloud State University

The Department of Physics, Astronomy and Engineering Science at St. Cloud State University invites applications for a tenure-track 9-month position (contingent on funding) at the rank of Assistant or Associate Professor to begin August 18, 2009. Responsibilities include to Develop and present live shows in the newly renovated SCSU Planetarium to audiences ranging from K-12 to college-level, the general public and special events. The successful candidate will also be expected to teach undergraduate courses with laboratories at all levels in the department, engage in scholarly activity and participate in continual development of departmental curriculum. In order to be considered for tenure, the successful candidate must demonstrate the ability to: 1)teach and perform assignments effectively; 2)conduct scholarly achievement or research; 3)continue preparation and study in the field; 4)contribute to student growth and development; and 5)provide service to the university and community.

Requirements are a master's degree in physics, astronomy or closely related area, and a strong and demonstrated interest in teaching and community outreach. A Ph.D. in physics/astronomy or closely related area is preferred, as is a demonstrated ability to teach and work with persons from culturally diverse backgrounds.

The SCSU Physics, Astronomy and Engineering Science faculty have high quality research programs in theoretical nuclear physics, laser spectroscopy, optics, and planetary science. Faculty and students have access to the SCSU Observatory and Center for Microscopic Imaging and Analysis. The SCSU Planetarium has a new Chronos star projector with new Spitz automation controls, lighting, sound, and dome.

To apply, submit a letter of interest, resume/vitae, transcripts (copies acceptable for initial screening) and three letters of professional reference to the address below. Review of applications will begin on Mar 2, 2009.

Dr. Maria Womack, Search Committee Chair WSB 324 Department of Physics, Astronomy and Engineering Science St. Cloud State University 720 Fourth Avenue South St. Cloud , MN 56301-4498 Phone: 320.308.2011 Fax: 320.308.4728 Email: mwomack_at_stcloustate.edu

Related URLs: http://www.stcloudstate.edu/physics/planetarium.asp (SCSU Planetarium) http://www.stcloudstate.edu/physics/default.asp (Department homepage) http://www.stcloudstate.edu/employment/aboutscsu.asp (About SCSU) http://www.stcloudstate.edu/about/stcloud/default.asp (About St. Cloud, Minnesota)

Back to top.
5. NYT Article: "In 'Geek chic'and Obama, new Hope for Lifting Women in
Science" by Natalie Angier
From: WIPHYS Jan. 21, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/science/20angier.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2

Back to top.
6. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

[Please remember to replace "_at_" in the below e-mail addresses.]

To submit to AASWOMEN: send email to aaswomen_at_aas.org All material sent to that address will be posted unless you tell us otherwise (including your email address).

To subscribe or unsubscribe to AASWOMEN go to http://lists.aas.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aaswomen and fill out the form.

If you experience any problems, please email itdept_at_aas.org

Back to top.
7. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

Past issues of AASWOMEN are available at

http://www.aas.org/cswa/AASWOMEN.html

Each annual summary includes an index of topics covered.

Back to top.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Ledbetter bill

It looks like one of the first pieces of legislation that might be passed by the Obama adminstration could be a wage discrimination act:

The legislation reverses a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that narrowly defines the time period during which a worker can file a claim of wage discrimination, even if the worker is unaware for months or years that he or she is getting less than colleagues doing the same job. It has been a priority for women's groups seeking to narrow the wage gap between men and women.

This is terrific. I hope that this will be applicable to negotiated start-up packages for faculty positions as well, because it's well known that women generally don't fare as well when it comes to negotiation.

Blogging for Choice

At the risk of delving into controversy, I want to note that today is the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, and also Blog for Choice Day.

Reproductive freedom, up to and including safe and legal abortions, is vital to women in science precisely because it allows us to choose how and when to start our families, or even whether to do so at all. At nearly every forum on women in science or women in astronomy I attend, the subject of having children always comes up: when's the best time? what about childcare? can I get maternity leave? how do you balance work and family? These questions are hard enough to answer. It's made slightly easier by having the freedom to choose.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

In ‘Geek Chic’ and Obama, New Hope for Lifting Women in Science

The New York Times

January 20, 2009
Basics
In ‘Geek Chic’ and Obama, New Hope for Lifting Women in Science
By NATALIE ANGIER

With the inauguration of an administration avowedly committed to Science as the grand elixir for the nation’s economic, environmental and psycho-reputational woes, a number of scientists say that now is the time to tackle a chronic conundrum of their beloved enterprise: how to attract more women into the fold, and keep them once they are there.

Researchers who have long promoted the cause of women in science view the incoming administration with a mix of optimism and we’ll-see-ism. On the one hand, they said, the new president’s apparent enthusiasm for science, and the concomitant rise of “geek chic” and “smart is the new cool” memes, can only redound to the benefit of all scientists, particularly if the enthusiasm is followed by a bolus of new research funds. On the other hand, they said, how about appointing a woman to the president’s personal Poindexter club, the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology? The designated leaders so far include superstars like Harold Varmus, a Nobel laureate, and Eric Lander, genome meister.

The Rosalind Franklin Society, a group devoted to “recognizing the work of prominent women scientists,” has suggested possible co-chairwomen for the panel. Its candidates include Shirley Ann Jackson, a nuclear physicist and president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and Shirley Tilghman, a molecular biologist and president of Princeton University. Others have proposed Jacqueline Barton, a chemist and MacArthur fellow at the California Institute of Technology. Or, given the increasing importance of brain research, how about a prominent female neuroscientist like Nancy Kanwisher of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology or Carla Shatz of Stanford University?

“People say, oh, we shouldn’t have quotas, but diversity is a form of excellence, and there are plenty of outstanding women out there,” Jo Handelsman, president of the Franklin society and a microbiologist at the University of Wisconsin, said in an interview. “You don’t have to lower your standards in the slightest — you just have to pay attention.”

Some would like to see novel approaches to treating systemic problems that often work against women’s scientific ambitions. Mary Ann Mason and Marc Goulden of the University of California, Berkeley, have gathered extensive data showing stark male-female differences in the family structure and personal lives of academic researchers at the top tiers of the profession.

Surveying outcomes for 160,000 Ph.D. recipients across the United States, the researchers determined that 70 percent of male tenured professors were married with children, compared with only 44 percent of their tenured female colleagues. Twelve years or more after receiving their doctorates, tenured women were more than twice as likely as tenured men to be single and significantly more likely to be divorced. And lest all of this look like “personal choice,” when the researchers asked 8,700 faculty members in the University of California system about family and work issues, nearly 40 percent of the women agreed with the statement, “I had fewer children than I wanted,” compared with less than 20 percent of the men. The take-home message, Dr. Mason said in a telephone interview, is, “Men can have it all, but women can’t.”

From a purely Darwinian point of view, expecting a young woman to sacrifice her reproductive fitness for the sake of career advancement is simply too much, and yet the structure of academic research, in which one must spend one’s 20s and early 30s as a poorly compensated and minimally empowered graduate student and postdoctoral fellow, and the remainder of one’s 30s and into the low 40s working madly to earn tenure, can demand exactly that.

Nor do all young men in science accept the notion that their lab bench must double as a sleeping cot while their wives take care of the kids. In a new survey of 19,000 doctoral students at the University of California, Dr. Mason and her colleagues found that while two-thirds of the respondents either had or planned to have children, 84 percent of the women and 74 percent of the men expressed worry about the family-unfriendliness of their intended profession, and many had changed their plans accordingly. While 40 percent of the male science graduate students and 31 percent of the women said they had begun their Ph.D. programs intent on pursuing an academic career — still considered the premier path to science glory — a year or more into their studies, only 28 percent of the men and 20 percent of the women still hoped to become research scientists at a university.

Dr. Mason and other legal experts suggest that President Obama might be able to change things significantly for young women in science — and young men — by signing an executive order that would provide added family leave and parental benefits to the recipients of federal grants, a huge pool of people that includes many research scientists.

Whatever the impediments, women have made great strides in most areas of science. According to Joan Burrelli of the National Science Foundation, whereas 50 years ago women earned a piddling 8 percent of the science and engineering doctorates, by 2006 they claimed a 40 percent share. In 1973, only 6 percent of the Ph.D. scientists employed full time in academia, business or elsewhere were women; by 2006 the number had risen to 27 percent. Over that same time frame, women’s share of full professorships in the sciences quadrupled, to about 20 percent. Yet the stats vary sharply from field to field: 26 percent of full professors in the life sciences are women, but in physics, 6 percent.

For many female physicists, the mystery of women’s slow progress through their ranks is nearly as baffling as the research mysteries they confront in the lab. Of course, only 6 percent of physics professors are female; only 4 to 6 percent of the matter in the universe is visible. “Sound familiar?” Evalyn Gates, the assistant director of the Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago, said wryly.

She has urged her colleagues to attack the problem of low female numbers as they would any scientific problem, by systematically gathering data, checking their detectors, factoring out background noise. Yes, girls and women leak out of the pipeline in comparatively greater numbers than males for every scientific discipline, she said, but they fall out of physics first and fastest. Why should it be, she said, that almost half of high school students in Advanced Placement physics classes are girls, but women earn only a fifth of bachelor’s degrees in physics? What turns girls away from physics so early?

Some have suggested that girls just can’t handle the advanced math of physics. Yet in an analysis of high school students’ performance on standardized math tests, published last summer in the journal Science, Janet Hyde and her colleagues found no gender differences in average performance, and even at the uppermost tails of achievement the discrepancies were minor and inconsistent: among whites who scored in the top 1 percent, there were two boys for every girl, whereas among Asian top scorers, there was one full girl for every nine-tenths of a boy. Besides, said Dr. Gates, female students earn half of the bachelor’s degrees in another math-heavy discipline called — mathematics.

Others have insisted that women just don’t like physics, perhaps because it seems cold and abstract, concerned with things rather than the flesh-and-blood focus of female-friendly fields like biology. But such reasoning, Dr. Gates said, cannot account for the fact that women earn half of the undergraduate degrees in chemistry, which is not quite plush toy material. “Something different is going on with physics, and we don’t know what it is yet,” she said. The culture? Bubble-headed television shows like “The Big Bang Theory,” with its four nerdy male physics prodigies and the fetching blond girl next door?

The difficulties are not confined to America. Surveying some 1,350 female physicists in 70 countries, Rachel Ivie and Stacy Guo of the American Institute of Physics found that, worse than family balance issues or lack of day care options, was the problem of public perception. The women were passionate about their work. They didn’t choose physics; physics chose them. Yet 80 percent agreed that attitudes about women in physics needed a serious overhaul.

As long as we’re making geek chic, let’s lose the Einstein ’do and moustache.

Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company

Friday, January 16, 2009

Balance: a generational divide

There's a great post by Alice Pawley of Sciencewomen about a study which surveyed doctoral students in the University of California system. They found:
major research universities may be losing some of the most talented tenure-track academics before they even arrive. In the eyes of many doctoral students, the academic fast track has a bad reputation—one of unrelenting work hours that allow little or no room for a satisfying family life. If this sentiment is broadly shared among current and future student cohorts, the future life-blood of academia may be at stake, as promising young scholars seek alternative career paths with better work-life balance. Today’s doctoral students are different in many ways from those of just thirty or forty years ago. [Emphasis mine]

Just today, I had a... let's call it a vigorous conversation... with an older female scientist, one who had chosen to forego having children in order to pursue her career. She asserted that you can't fault men for their successes, just because they decide to spend all their energy on their careers instead of their families. They are harder workers, so they justly deserve their tenured positions at prestigious universities. She is of the opinion that you just can't have it all.

Now there is some truth to what she says. On the other hand, it means that there's a lot of talent going to waste. The aforementioned study finds that 84% of women and 74% of men were somewhat or very concerned about the family friendliness of their career paths. So work/family balance really is becoming a real issue for both women and men.

For those of earlier generations (I count myself as one of the younger generation, thankyouverymuch), perhaps it really was the case that women had to choose between career and family. The cultural paradigm was one where men worked out of the house, and women stayed home with their children. Today, the dominant paradigm is becoming one of dual-career couples, although there are still those (mostly women) who choose to stay home with their kids.

The problem as I see it is that the fast-track trajectory of grad school-postdoc-faculty-tenure leaves precious little room for variation. Alternative career paths do exist, but in astronomy, this almost always involves giving up either research or job security. What I would like to see is some kind of middle ground, where your research is valued for its quality, not the quantity. I would like to see flexibility in workplace demands, so that you can take time off when you need it, and come back when you're ready.1

Because I think the section on re-envisioning academia at the end of the article does a good job of encapsulating my further thoughts on the subject, I'll simply quote it below. (Click on "link to full post" to see.)

  • Assumption: Fast-track academia is typically either a fulltime or a no-time pursuit, particularly for those on fellowships or grants. Antidote: Men and women can shift to part-time status or temporarily elongate timelines over their academic lives without suffering career penalties.
  • Assumption: The appropriate career trajectory for successful academics is linear and without breaks—from the doctoral years to postdoctoral experience to pretenure years to the attainment of the rank of full professor. Antidote: Many men and women will want or need to take time out temporarily from their academic lives for caregiving, and universities will support their reentry.
  • Assumption: Academic “stars” are those who move through the ranks very quickly. Antidote: Academic “stars” are those who produce the most important or relevant work—faster is not necessarily better.
  • Assumption: There is no good time to have children. Antidote: It is fine to have children at any point in the career path because a full array of resources exists to support academic parents.
  • Assumption: Having children, particularly for women, is often equated with less seriousness and drive. Antidote: There is no stigma associated with having children, nor are there negative career consequences, and the culture is broadly supportive of academics who do have children.
  • Assumption: All talented doctoral students should want to become professors on the academic fast track. Antidote: Venues exist to evaluate objectively and discuss different career and life paths in and outside academia—all are accepted.
  • Assumption: Work-life balance and family friendliness are not typically promoted as important values by academic administrators and faculty. Antidote: Family-friendly policies are promoted, campuswide conferences are held to support work-life balance for all academics, department chairs are trained on the issues, and faculty mentor doctoral students.


1Also, I want a pony.