Wednesday, July 9, 2008

AASWomen for June 27, 2008

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of June 28, 2008
eds. Joan Schmelz, Hannah Jang-Condell & Caroline Simpson

This week's issues:

1. Gender Issues In Science/Math Education

2. Celebrate Women In Physics Poster

3. MIT'S Midcareer Acceleration Program

*** FOLLOWING POSITIONS WERE TAKEN FROM WIPHYS ***

4. Two-Year Half-Research Half-Teaching Post-Doc

5. Postdoctoral Fellowship Program For Recent PHDs, University Of
Michigan

6. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

7. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. GENDER ISSUES IN SCIENCE/MATH EDUCATION
From: WIPHYS, June 17, 2008

"Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME)" [Hake & Mallow
(2008)].

This 11.8 MB compilation of over 700 annotated references and 1000
hot-linked URL's provides a window into the vast literature on Gender
Issues in Science/Math Education. The present listing is an update,
expansion, and generalization of the earlier 0.23 MB "Gender Issues
in Physics/Science Education (GIPSE)" by Mallow & Hake (2002).

Of course, Jeffry Mallow and I would be very interested in any
comments any of you might care to make on GISME.

To access GISME, please click on
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>, scroll to item 55, and then
click on [GISME-5k-Part1.pdf] for Part 1 and [GISME-5k-Part2.pdf] for
Part 2.

The earlier "Gender Issues in Physics/Science Education (GIPSE)"
[Mallow & Hake (2002)] can be found on the APS website
http://www.aps.org/programs/women/resources/gender.cfm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CELEBRATE WOMEN IN PHYSICS POSTER
From: WIPHYS, June 23, 2008

CSWP has a new Celebrate Women in Physics Poster! This full-color
poster http://www.aps.org/programs/women/index.cfm highlights women
physicists actively pursuing their work. The poster is 16 inches x 20
inches and fits easily on a door or bulletin board. To order, please
send an email to women_at_aps.org and include your full mailing address.
We reserve the right to limit quantities.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. MIT'S MIDCAREER ACCELERATION PROGRAM
From: WIPHYS, June 23, 2008

Information Session - July 2, 2008. MIT's Midcareer Acceleration Program
(MAP) is designed to help students sharpen the skills essential to
prepare for career reentry, for those who left the workforce and now
wish to return, and career retooling, for those who want to prepare for
a challenging new position or transition into a new industry. The
program incorporates career and personal development, a semester-long
MIT course, and an internship or research project.

Please join us for our last information session of the year. The
information session will be an overview of MAP, including a
discussion of:
* the goals of the program,
* experiences of the people who participated in the program,
* resources available at MIT, and
* support available to you while going through the program.

To RSVP for the July 2 information session, please submit your
request here: http://midcareer.mit.edu/?source=map1 . If you or someone
you know could benefit from this program, please review the MAP program
website, read the profiles, and take a look at the program curriculum
to learn more. http://midcareer.mit.edu/?source=map1

If you will be unable to make the July 2 Info Session but still wish
to discuss how this program may work for your unique situation,
please email Midcareer_at_mit.edu with your request.

Dawna S. Levenson
Associate Director, Academic Programs
MIT Professional Education Programs

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Two-Year Half-Research Half-Teaching Post-Doc
From: WIPHYS, June 27, 2008

The College of Wooster invites applications for a two-year Post-
Doctoral Research position in physics beginning August 2008 or
January 2009. This position will involve half-time research and half-
time teaching. The qualified candidate will typically teach one
course and one lab each semester, have the opportunity to guide
student research, and conduct research in collaboration with our
departmental faculty. This position supports recent PhDs
transitioning from graduate school to permanent academic positions
and provides mentoring in both teaching and the development of an
independent research program. Teaching opportunities include both our
introductory and advanced courses. PhD in physics or related field
expected.

Our department is an inclusive community that emphasizes cooperation
over competition. A June 2004 report by the American Institute of
Physics lists our department in a short table of physics programs
with high student satisfaction and high bachelor's degree production.
Our physics club has won national awards for its elementary school
outreach program. Our NSF-REU summer program has attracted students
from 18 states and 37 institutions to work closely with faculty on
research projects. Each Wooster student completes a yearlong senior
thesis project in our nationally recognized senior capstone program.
Wooster ranks in the top 3 percent nationally as the baccalaureate
origin of PhDs when compared with other 4-year institutions.

Send cover letter, CV, unofficial graduate transcripts, and three
letters of recommendation to Dr. John Lindner, Physics Chair, at
JLindner_at_Wooster.edu. Consideration of applications will begin
immediately and will continue until the position is filled.

The College of Wooster is an independent college of the liberal arts
and sciences with a commitment to excellence in undergraduate
education. The College values diversity, strives to attract qualified
women and minority candidates, and encourages individuals belonging
to these groups to apply. Wooster seeks to ensure diversity by its
policy of employing persons without regard to age, sex, color, race,
creed, religion, national origin, disability, veteran status, sexual
orientation, or political affiliation. The College of Wooster is an
Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer. Employment is subject
to federal laws requiring verification of identity and legal right to
work in the United States as required by the Immigration Reform and
Control Act. Drug-free workplace.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Postdoctoral Fellowship Program For Recent PHDs, University Of
Michigan
From: WIPHYS, June 27, 2008

The Michigan Society of Fellows invites applications to its postdoctoral
fellowship program for recent PhDs in the humanities, arts, sciences,
and professions. These three-year positions at the University of
Michigan are open to recent PhDs who wish to pursue research
opportunities while teaching at a major research university. Eight
fellowships are available, with an annual stipend of $51,500. Four of
these fellowships will be awarded in the humanities, with the support of
the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Applications must be submitted
electronically by midnight September 30, 2008. The online application
is available at www.rackham.umich.edu/Faculty/sof.html. Questions may be
submitted to society.of.fellows_at_umich.edu

Myron Campbell
Chair, Physics Department
University of Michigan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

[Please remember to replace "_at_" in the below e-mail addresses.]

To submit to AASWOMEN:
send email to aaswomen_at_aas.org
All material sent to that address will be posted unless you tell us
otherwise (including your email address).

To subscribe or unsubscribe to AASWOMEN
go to http://lists.aas.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aaswomen
and fill out the form.

If you experience any problems, please email itdept_at_aas.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

Past issues of AASWOMEN are available at

http://www.aas.org/cswa/AASWOMEN.html

Each annual summary includes an index of topics covered.

Monday, June 23, 2008

AASWOMEN for June 20, 2008

AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of June 20, 2008
eds. Joan Schmelz, Hannah Jang-Condell & Caroline Simpson

This week's issues:

1. Culture, Gender and Math

2. Gender Issues in Math/Science Education

3. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

4. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Culture, Gender and Math
From: John Parejko [parejkoj_at_drexel.edu]

This article on the math and reading scores of girls in different
countries might be of interest to the list.  Short summary: 15 year
old girls do better compared to boys, in both math and reading (as
measured by the Programme for International Student Assessment), in
countries that are more gender equal (as measured by the UN and World
Economic Forum's Gender Gap Index).  In the countries with the highest
levels of gender equality, the "math gender gap" essentially
disappears.


Another take away point is that, apparently, girls are better than
boys, in both math and reading, in Iceland...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Gender Issues in Math/Science Education
From: WIPHYS of June 17, 2008

WIPHYS [and AASWOMEN] subscribers might be interested in "Gender
Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME)" [Hake & Mallow (2008)].

This 11.8 MB compilation of over 700 annotated references and 1000 
hot-linked URL's provides a window into the vast literature on Gender 
Issues in Science/Math Education. The present listing is an update, 
expansion, and generalization of the earlier 0.23 MB "Gender Issues 
in Physics/Science Education (GIPSE)" by Mallow & Hake (2002).

Of course, Jeffry Mallow and I would be very interested in any 
comments any of you might care to make on GISME.

To access GISME, please click on 
< http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake >, scroll to item 55, and then 
click on [GISME-5k-Part1.pdf] for Part 1 and [GISME-5k-Part2.pdf] for 
Part 2. 

The earlier "Gender Issues in Physics/Science Education (GIPSE)" 
[Mallow & Hake (2002)] can be found on the APS website 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN

[Please remember to replace "_at_" in the below e-mail addresses.]

To submit to AASWOMEN:
 send email to aaswomen_at_aas.org
All material sent to that address will be posted unless you tell us
 otherwise (including your email address). 

To subscribe or unsubscribe to AASWOMEN
and fill out the form.

If you experience any problems, please email itdept_at_aas.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN

Past issues of AASWOMEN are available at


Each annual summary includes an index of topics covered.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Having children in grad school

A friend of mine sent me this article about women who decided to have children during graduate school. It being the Boston Globe, they naturally stuck to Boston area schools.

Having gone to a Boston area school for grad school and having had both my kids during my years there, naturally this article resonated with me. For me, having my kids during grad school made a lot of sense. As the article says:
Some women say having a child during graduate school is appealing because their schedules offer flexibility. They figure potential employers won't be concerned with how long it took them to get their dissertation done. And they know once they get hired as postdoctorates, they'll be too busy trying to get articles published in high-quality journals to have a child.

However, that isn't to say that it was easy. Heck, having kids is never easy, period.
"They want to know how this can work," Jaschik said. "They're trying to figure out: 'If I have a kid, am I never going to finish my dissertation? Will I never have a job?' "

...

"I want to have a career. I want to finish this," Mazmanian said. "At the same time, I love being a mom."

These are concerns that will never go away. Here I am, in my second postdoc, still wondering if I'll land another job. I am constantly torn by wanting to be both a good researcher and a good mother. And really, it doesn't matter when you have kids -- you will inevitably feel this sense of divided loyalties.

On a side note, I have to wonder why men never seem to have to face these issues. Sure, they don't have to deal with pregnancy and post-partum recovery, but surely they worry about childcare issues, too. Surely they love their children just as much as women do. Is it because they aren't allowed to admit how much they care? Is it because they delegate all that responsibility to the mothers? Is it because a mother who delegates that responsibility to the father is by definition a bad mother? Anyway, back to the main story...

There's a ray of hope:
[A student committee at the Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences] recommended that the school adopt a policy that would provide child-care assistance. It also recommended that Harvard let students take up to a one-year leave to care for a baby by enabling them to stop the clock on their dissertations, keep their health insurance, receive stipends, and, upon their return to school, provide them flexibility in course work and teaching positions.

That's awesome. I'm glad to see a prestigious school like Harvard setting an example by making it easier for grad students to have children.

However, I argue that this isn't enough. Most of my peers in graduate school weren't even married. Not that that necessarily precludes having children, but being in a stable, long-term relationship helps immensely. Not to mention that having children on solely a grad student stipend is financially infeasible. In fact, in astronomy at least, the prime child-bearing years seem to coincide precisely with the post-doc years.

What sort of policies does Harvard have in place for allowing their postdocs to take time off to have children? Does it make childcare arrangements accessible to postdocs? What provisions do the Hubble/Chandra/Spitzer Fellowships allow for maternity/paternity leave? How do hiring committees view publication gaps: is it better or worse to mention children?

The US already lags far behind most industrialized nations in terms of laws protecting maternity/paternity leave. The academic community could do a lot to make things better.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

From the NY Times May 20, 2008

The New York Times

May 20, 2008

Girls’ Gains Have Not Cost Boys, Report Says

The American Association of University Women, whose 1992 report on how girls are shortchanged in the classroom caused a national debate over gender equity, has turned its attention to debunking the idea of a “boys’ crisis.”

“Girls’ gains have not come at boys’ expense,” says a new report by the group, to be released on Tuesday in Washington.

Echoing research released two years ago by the American Council on Education and other groups, the report says that while girls have for years graduated from high school and college at a higher rate than boys, the largest disparities in educational achievement are not between boys and girls, but between those of different races, ethnicities and income levels.

In examining a range of standardized test scores, the report finds some intriguing nuggets about the interplay of family income, race, ethnicity and academic performance. For example, it finds that while boys generally outperform girls on both the math and verbal parts of the SAT, the male advantage on the verbal test is consistent only among low-income students, and that among black students, there was no consistent advantage by sex from 1994 to 2004.

And while boys of all races and ethnicities generally outscored girls of the same group on the math section, the gap by sex for black students was only about half as large as other groups.

The report points out that a greater proportion of men and women than ever before are graduating from high school and earning college degrees. But, it says, “perhaps the most compelling evidence against the existence of a boys’ crisis is that men continue to outearn women in the workplace.”

Linda Hallman, who became executive director of the university women’s group in January, when the work was well under way, said the report was an effort to refocus attention on what she said were the real problems of education for poor and minority children, and away from a distracting debate about a so-called boys’ crisis. Ms. Hallman said the group’s members were concerned about arguments by conservative commentators that boys had become disadvantaged and were being discriminated against in schools intended to favor girls.

“Many people remain uncomfortable with the educational and professional advances of girls and women, especially when they threaten to outdistance their male peers,” the report says , citing Christina Hoff Sommers’s 2000 book, “The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men.”

Ms. Hallman said, “To have this distracter out there, about the boys’ crisis, took away from our mission, from pushing forward for what we were trying to achieve, which is to be a leader in dealing with the education crisis that affects girls and boys without many resources.”

The report may provide new fodder in the battle over whether boys and girls need different methods of teaching.

“There’s still a lot of debate about whether there’s something we should be doing differently in teaching boys and girls,” said Sara Mead, a senior research fellow at the New America Foundation, a nonprofit research group in Washington, who has written on gender equity. “The people on the feminist-leaning side of the debate see the conversation about a boys’ crisis as a strategy to advance the single-sex education agenda. I’m not sure that’s correct. I don’t think the kind of data we have about boys’ and girls’ achievement tells us anything useful about single-sex education.”

The report finds that, generally, boys and girls of similar backgrounds have similar academic success. And the five states in which boys score highest on the tests known as the nation’s report card are also the highest-scoring states for girls, it says.


Thursday, April 17, 2008

Working Twice As Hard for Half the Credit

Here's an interesting article: A Case Study of Gender Bias at the Postdoctoral Level in Physics, and its Resulting Impact on the Academic Career Advancement of Females, by S. Towers. From the abstract:

The study finds that the female researchers were on average significantly more productive compared to their male peers, yet were allocated only 1/3 the amount of conference presentations based on their productivity. The study also finds that the dramatic gender bias in allocation of conference presentations appeared to have significant negative impact on the academic career advancement of the females.
The author has a PhD in particle physics and worked for 6 years as a postdoctoral research scientist. She is currently completing a graduate degree in statistics.


It's interesting that the author included that last statement about her qualifications. It's as if she knows that some gender-bias-denialist might question her statistical methods and what not.

Not only does this study demonstrably show gender bias, but it supports the view I've long suspected, that if you want to land a plum job, you gotta get your name out there, and the way to get your name out there is by giving talks at conferences.

Guess I ought to get moving on submitting those conference abstracts...

[hat tip: Thus Spake Zuska. cross posted at Twinke Twinkle YSO]